"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."
- Mahatma Gandhi
 
Top News arrow Testimonies and Presentations
Testimonies and Presentations
Conflicts of Interest policy - New York Times PDF Print E-mail
Sunday, 28 March 2004

Friday's New York Times included the following Editor's Note on the paper's Op Ed page: "An Op-Ed article on Tuesday discussing the vulnerability of the proposed Freedom Tower to terrorist attack should have included additional information about the writer, Daniel Benjamin. Mr. Benjamin was once paid to serve as an expert witness on Al Qaeda in a lawsuit involving Larry A. Silverstein, the developer of the tower. Although the lawsuit had nothing to do with the Freedom Tower, that relationship should."

That editor's note represents responsible journalism. Why does the Times consistently fail to apply the same conflict of interest disclosure policy to its medical news reports and opinion columns by guest writers?

Read more...
 
AHRP Calls for Federal Investigation of Drug Trials Using Children in Foster Care PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 10 March 2004

RE: Phase I Drug trials used foster children in violation of 45 CFR 46.409 and 21 CFR 50.56

The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP) has reason to believe that federal regulations for the protection of children as research subjects have been seriously violated in federally funded HIV research.

We have learned that a series of Phase I and Phase II drug experiments were conducted on infants and children who were under the guardianship of the New York City Agency for Children's Services (ACS), and living at Incarnation Children's Center, a foster care facility under contract with ACS.

Read more...
 
AHRP Press Briefing: Scientists Will Analyze SSRI Data, Families Will Tell Their Tragedies PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 27 January 2004

Excerpt: The British drug authority has banned the use of most SSRI antidepressant drugs for the treatment of depression in children under 18, citing a two-to-threefold increased risk of suicidal behavior and lack of evidence of a benefit for depressed children. Two SSRIs - Paxil and Effexor - are no longer recommended by their manufacturer for use in children. Prozac is no longer recommended by Eli Lilly for children in the U.K.

In contrast to the British medicines authority review of the evidence, the FDA has refused to allow independent scientists to present documented evidence related to these drugs' hazards and their failure to demonstrate a benefit for depressed children.

Read more...
 
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act of 2002 PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 18 August 2003

Comments submitted by The Alliance for Human Research Protection
to The National Academy of Sciences
Committee of the Institute of Medicine on Clinical Research Involving Children

AHRP has been closely monitoring pediatric research trends since passage of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997. We believe that medications used in children should be thoroughly tested for safety, effectiveness and appropriate dose. But unlike adults who can exercise their autonomous right to informed consent, children who are enrolled in clinical trials are non-consensual human subjects. They should not, therefore, be made to assume the burden of testing possibly toxic drugs whose safety is unknown.

Read more...
 
OHRP Found NHLBI Lung Experiments Violated Informed Consent PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 07 July 2003

On July 3 the federal Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP) issued a stinging indictment of the research review and approval process at some of the nation's most prestigious research institutions--including the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/detrm_letrs/YR03/jul03a.pdf

The retirement of Dr. Claude Lenfant, director of NHLBI was announced the same day. See: http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/03/07/03.php]

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>

Results 19 - 27 of 51
(C) 2010 Alliance for Human Research Protection
CMS installation and website development by Anne Krauss

General Terms & Disclaimer:

This site is not a monologue of truth. It is a catalyst for public debate about medical research conduct. The reader is urged to confront officials to clarify issues mentioned herein. This site is designed strictly to provide information for critical, literary, academic an public usage. A qualified and trustworthy medical professional must be consulted regarding medical issues, treatments, diagnoses, etc.

Please read the General Terms and Conditions of this agreement entirely and carefully before accessing this web site. By accessing the site, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions listed herein. [continue]