|
FDA officials who continue to run its powerful center for drug evaluation (CDER) have once again shown bad faith by appointing financially compromised doctors to the Psychopharmacologic Drugs
Advisory Committee (PDAC) advisory panel.
Advisory panel recommendations for
expanded marketing approval are usually followed by the FDA. Philadelphia Inquirer journalist, Miriam
Hill, reports that until yesterday, the chair of PDAC was listed as Dr. Jorge
Armenteros, a psychiatrist hired by AstraZeneca "to talk to other doctors
about prescribing Seroquel, the company's antipsychotic." But suddenly, his name was removed and the
other panel members who were also paid by AstraZeneca, will not be voting.
Why not?
"Paul Pennock and Steve
Sheller, lawyers who are suing AstraZeneca and other makers of antipsychotics
on behalf of patients who say the drugs triggered their diabetes, say it's
because they uncovered company documents revealing potential conflicts of
interest."
Worse still: "In documents
Pennock obtained as part of the lawsuits, the most serious of the possible
conflicts detailed involves Armenteros. In addition to being a paid speaker for
AstraZeneca, he proposed research comparing Seroquel to Risperidone, a
competing psychotic used to treat aggression in children."
FDA--CDER procedures raise serious
doubts about the legitimacy of its initial approval process by which
AstraZeneca gained FDA marketing approval for Seroquel.
"The industry is infected with greed," said Sheller, who runs
the Philadelphia
law firm that bears his name. "You can't trust the approvals, you can't
trust the studies, and now you can't trust the FDA."
FDA's drug approval process--both
initial approvals and expanded label approvals--needs to be thoroughly
overhauled, and the CDER leadership removed.
See Seroquel (quetiapine) safety
profile: http://news.prnewswire.com/ViewContent.aspx?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/04-03-2009/0005000638&EDATE=
Posted
by Vera Hassner Sharav
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/business/20090404_Conflicts_for_FDA_committee_set_to_weigh_risks_of_Seroquel.html
PhiladelphiaInquirer
Conflicts for FDA committee set to weigh risks of Seroquel
By Miriam Hill
AstraZeneca P.L.C. paid Florida child
psychiatrist Jorge Armenteros to talk to other doctors about prescribing
Seroquel, the company's powerful antipsychotic.
And until yesterday, Armenteros also
was listed as the chair and a voting member of a Food and Drug Administration
advisory committee with a lot of power over Seroquel, which generated $4.45
billion in sales last year for AstraZeneca, whose U.S.
headquarters are in Wilmington.
On Wednesday, the advisory committee
is expected to decide whether to expand dramatically the use of Seroquel XR, an
extended-release version of the drug, which is used to treat depression and
anxiety. But five members - including Armenteros, who did not return a call to
his Coral Gables, Fla., office seeking comment - will not be
voting.
Why not?
Paul Pennock and Steve Sheller,
lawyers who are suing AstraZeneca and other makers of antipsychotics on behalf
of patients who say the drugs triggered their diabetes, say it's because they
uncovered company documents revealing potential conflicts of interest.
AstraZeneca said yesterday it had no
say regarding which committee members vote, and referred questions to the FDA.
Company spokesman Tony Jewell said,
"AstraZeneca believes the Advisory Board and the FDA will make the
appropriate scientific and medical determination concerning the benefit-risk
profile of the company's supplemental new drug applications for Seroquel XR in
major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder."
FDA spokeswoman Sandy Walsh said
that temporary members sometimes replace standing committee members but that
the agency does not say why such substitutions occur. Armenteros remains the
chair of the standing committee until his term expires in June, she said.
Many researchers receive pay from
the pharmaceutical industry, which funds most research. Government officials
have increasingly encouraged disclosure of such relationships.
In documents Pennock obtained as
part of the lawsuits, the most serious of the possible conflicts detailed
involves Armenteros. In addition to being a paid speaker for AstraZeneca, he
proposed research comparing Seroquel to Risperidone, a competing psychotic used
to treat aggression in children.
London-based AstraZeneca did not
approve the research, the documents show.
Armenteros often studied
antipsychotics in children, according to a database funded by the National
Institutes of Health.
"How can someone sit as chair
of an FDA advisory committee crucial to AstraZeneca and Seroquel for five years
even though he was an extensively trained speaker for AstraZeneca on
Seroquel?" asked Pennock, a lawyer for the New York firm Weitz & Luxenberg.
The revelations come amid intense
scrutiny of the FDA and of relationships between researchers and drug
companies.
"The industry is infected with
greed," said Sheller, who runs the Philadelphia
law firm that bears his name. "You can't trust the approvals, you can't
trust the studies, and now you can't trust the FDA."
If the FDA committee approves the
expansion, it would give AstraZeneca access to millions more patients because
so many people suffer from depression and anxiety.
Currently, the FDA has approved
Seroquel to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, relatively rare diseases.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain
copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for
educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy,
scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is
distributed without profit.
|