AHRP is a national network of lay people and professionals dedicated to advancing responsible and ethical medical research practices, to ensure that the human rights, dignity and welfare of human subjects are protected, and to minimize the risks associated with such endeavors.
 
Top News arrow Safety Issues arrow Another Coffin Nail for Avandia
Another Coffin Nail for Avandia Print E-mail
Wednesday, 21 July 2010
The FDA announced that the postmarketing trial of Avandia, known as TIDE, has been placed on "partial clinical hold."   No new patients may be enrolled in the trial.

The suspension follows the suspension of the TIDE trial in India, July 14, at the request of the Indian government which was concerned about the drug's safety following revelations reported by The New York Times , documenting how GlaxoSmithKline concealed drug-induced heart attacks and falsely claimed the drug's safety./10diabetes.html and http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/710/9/

 The TIDE trial is inherently unethical: it is designed to compare Avandia, a drug that has been shown to significantly increase the risk of heart attacks--and death--to a competitor drug, Actos, whose safety record shows no such serious risks. 

GSK argued before an FDA advisory committee that a head to head trial would prove that Avandia does not cause heart attacks after all, and that all the evidence against the drug was "not scientific."
 
GSK' record of deceptive, illegal drug marketing tactics are a matter of public record. Those tactics and its defective drugs--including Paxil and Avandia--resulted in the deaths of thousands of people--even maiming infants in the womb.

That GSK attempted to buy time for its defective drug, Avandia, until its patent runs out, is not surprising. 

What is more disturbing is that a combined FDA advisory panel of medical "experts" (33 in all) did not reject GSK's argument, and did not object to the TIDE trial to go forth--even as they voted overwhelmingly (29 to 3) to add warnings (7), to restrict the drug's sales and add warnings (10), to withdraw the drug from the market (12).

The failure, by a supposedly objective group of academic medical doctors and scientists, to suspend an immoral trial which was designed in the knowledge that patients would be put at risk of cardiac arrest for marketing purposes, speaks volumes about the state of American medicine.

 Vera Hassner Sharav

 
< Prev   Next >
(C) 2012 Alliance for Human Research Protection
CMS installation and website development by Anne Krauss

General Terms & Disclaimer:

This site is not a monologue of truth. It is a catalyst for public debate about medical research conduct. The reader is urged to confront officials to clarify issues mentioned herein. This site is designed strictly to provide information for critical, literary, academic an public usage. A qualified and trustworthy medical professional must be consulted regarding medical issues, treatments, diagnoses, etc.

Please read the General Terms and Conditions of this agreement entirely and carefully before accessing this web site. By accessing the site, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions listed herein. [continue]